and Safety Executive may introduce strict safety criteria to local
building regulations and step up its publicising of convictions.
The chair of the HSE, Judith Hackitt and the chief executive Geoffrey
Podger confirmed that the HSE was considering a range of proposals in
a bid to tackle the in industry's death toll.
In 2008/09, early indications show that fatalities within the
construction industry may have declined by more than 20% to
approximately 55. Despite the percentage drop, the HSE remains adamant
to crackdown even more and prevent an increase in fatalities when
activity in the sector picks up.
New Rules
Ms Hackitt told the Work and Pensions Select Committee that one way of
clamping down on bad practice, could be strict new rules within the
building regulations.
Ms Hackitt said: "We want to look at the practicality of doing that
because... we think there is a sound logic to the notion that says not
only should [an] extension be built to last and to not put at risk
those who are going to live in it, it should be built in a way that
doesn't put at risk the people who have to build it in the first
place."
However, she did caution the committee that the cost of pressures
within local authorities could have an affect on any possible further
proposals.
Mr Podger told the committee that the HSE was also looking at ways of
increasing publicity about firms convicted of health and safety
offences.
He said: "Often for companies it is not the fine that is the
punishment, but the publicity around it. This is an area where we want
to try and do more.
"We want to try and publicise some of these cases nationally, as well
as regionally and locally."
Committee chair Terry Rooney, who was scathing of the regulator's
enforcement levels, called on the HSE to re-examine the fines being
handed down by courts around the country.
He said it was concerning that companies were still fined less for
fatalities than for anti-competitive behaviour, and said "something
needs to be done" about geographical differences in fines.
"There is concrete evidence of widespread geographic differences in
penalties. For example, in the South-west you will get fined a lot
more than you will in the North-east," he said.
Ms Hackitt assured him: "I think both of those things need to be addressed.
"We should not rest where we are, but continue to press for a more
equitable viewing of different offences."
Committee criticisms
The regulator, however, shrugged off criticisms from the committee
that enforcement notices were down for the fourth year running.
Mr Podger said: "I don't accept at all that there is a downward trend
that is just going to manifest itself forever."
Meanwhile, the relationship between the HSE and construction union
Ucatt deteriorated further amid a row over the recording of the
employment status of construction workers killed at work.
Ucatt raised serious concerns about the collection of what it called
"vital evidence" following fatalities, including data on whether
victims were members of the Construction Industry Scheme.
Committee member Tom Levitt asked Ms Hackitt and Mr Podger why CIS
data was still not being thoroughly collected, despite a pledge to do
so in September 2007.
Mr Podger hit back, claiming CIS data was not relevant to the HSE's
work and that the regulator simply got "the best data that we can". He
said the nature of construction sites made "it more difficult to get a
grip of what is going on".
He added: "From our perspective, which is different to Ucatt's, we
would have the data we need and we would act on it."
No comments:
Post a Comment